GECA — A Strategic Analysis of Expert Insights from GECA’s Architects of Change Panel
Discussion Paper for Consultation — This article synthesizes insights from GECA’s “Architects of Change” panel (Moderator: Devin Thorpe; Panelists: Chris Lustrino – Kingscrowd , Scott McIntyre – WEconomy/ Crowdfunding Professional Association, Nora Szeles – Tokeportal.com, Neera Patel – Dacxi Chain). Statistics and estimates reflect panel discussion and require empirical validation. This is not a GECA policy statement.
Executive Summary
The global equity crowdfunding industry stands at a critical inflection point where liquidity – or the lack thereof – represents both its greatest challenge and most significant opportunity. Insights from leading industry practitioners suggest that secondary-market development could unlock a trillion-dollar opportunity by transforming crowdfunding from an illiquid investment class into a dynamic ecosystem that rivals traditional capital markets.
Key Strategic Findings
- Market Velocity Crisis: ~70–80% of investors prefer accessible liquidity options (panel estimate; to be validated), while capital typically remains locked for 3–10+ years, creating systemic velocity constraints.
- Trust Infrastructure Gap: Current secondary venues often lack transparent valuation mechanisms; StartEngine’s secondary posting board illustrates information asymmetry challenges when listings show a name and price but little decision support.
- Regulatory Fragmentation Costs: Platforms navigate a complex global legal patchwork; in the EU, ECSPR alignment helps, but some manual compliance elements still undermine efficiency gains.
- Technology Readiness vs. Adoption: Blockchain can enable embedded compliance and atomic settlement, but regulatory hesitancy and UX considerations slow adoption.
- Generational Liquidity Demand: Liquidity preference is situational, not purely generational – younger investors can be equally or more liquidity-sensitive, influenced by crypto’s always-on trading.
Design Options for Working-Group Evaluation
The following are options and hypotheses for GECA working groups to evaluate; they are not GECA policy or directives.
- Valuation & Transparency Layer: Pilot standardized, data-driven pricing signals and a minimum-disclosure pack for secondary eligibility.
- Bilateral Recognition Pilots: Explore principle-based mutual recognition (e.g., KYC/AML attestations, disclosure baselines) with one or two compatible regulators.
- Embedded Compliance (Tech-Enabled): Test where smart-contract logic can automate transfer restrictions – without imposing crypto-native UX on retail investors.
- Distribution Pathways: Assess light integrations with major brokerages/RIAs (data syndication, guided hand-offs) to broaden reach and price discovery.
- Trust-First Market Design: Prioritize ratings/verification, auditability, and transparent dispute resolution ahead of raw transaction speed.
The Liquidity-Velocity Challenge: Quantifying Market Constraints
“The velocity of the market is very slow today. A lot of people enter the market and then they go back to sitting on the sidelines waiting for something to happen.” — Chris Lustrino
Investors often expect returns within 1–2 years despite being advised to anticipate 10–15-year holding periods. When exits don’t materialize, many pause new allocations until they see actual liquidity from existing positions. Lustrino estimates 70–80% of investors (panel estimate; to be validated) want liquidity regardless of age cohort.
He hypothesizes that predictable partial liquidity – e.g., the ability to sell 15–30% of a portfolio annually – could materially increase participation:
“When you create a functioning secondary market where you have a good amount of predictability that each year you can sell at least 15, 20, 30% of your overall portfolio, you’re going to see way more participants in the market.”
The Trust Infrastructure Deficit: Information Asymmetry as a Market Barrier
“Trust is the actual currency of any marketplace. Ratings and transparency are what makes trust tradable.” — Scott McIntyre
Today’s secondary listings are often thin on decision-quality data. As Lustrino noted about StartEngine’s secondary posting board, many offers show just a name and a price – not enough context for a fair decision. McIntyre argued that standardized data – comparable financials, consistent definitions, and verified disclosures – reduces information asymmetry, especially across cultures and languages.
Why thin data hurts pricing
- Inconsistent disclosures make relative value opaque.
- Retail investors face higher error risk without verified comparables.
- Sparse context depresses confidence and market velocity.
A practical research layer (what “good” looks like)
Lustrino outlined a workable model: use recent filings and peer fundamentals to produce valuation “green zones”—ranges where risk/return looks reasonable—giving buyers and sellers shared reference points.
Regulatory Architecture: Three Hurdles to Global Implementation
Neera Patel highlighted three structural hurdles:
- Global Legal Patchwork – Multiple, sometimes conflicting securities rules across jurisdictions multiply compliance cost and complexity.
- Exchange vs. Bulletin Board Classification – Crossing into “unregistered exchange” territory triggers heavier obligations; many venues default to manual bulletin boards to stay compliant.
- Cross-Jurisdictional Compliance & Custody – KYC/AML, asset custody, and transfer rules vary widely and scale poorly across borders.
ECSPR: Progress and paradox
Patel views ECSPR as a strong blueprint (single license; shared rules) that improves cross-border raising. Yet Nora Szeles flagged the “ECSPR paradox”: regulators created the market, but independent, often cash-flow-negative startups must both build it and educate regulators. National implementations and ICT expectations can still feel modeled on incumbents, not startups.
Technology Infrastructure: Blockchain Capabilities vs. Implementation Reality
Where blockchain helps
- Embedded compliance: Smart contracts can enforce transfer restrictions and eligibility.
- Atomic settlement & audit trails: Faster, more transparent cross-border settlement; zero-knowledge proofs for privacy-preserving verification.
- Self-custody options: Direct ownership pathways where appropriate.
Why explainability still wins
“Is this the tail wagging the dog?” — Scott McIntyre
McIntyre cautioned that technology must earn trust through clarity and accountability, not just speed. Lustrino added that distribution may matter more than chain-selection:
“The market goes to the stratosphere when Robinhood/SoFi/Schwab/Fidelity put these opportunities into brokerage accounts and advisors’ toolkits.”
Potential Industry Impact: The Democratization Dividend – and Small-Company Concerns
“Liquidity heightens inclusion… it also creates the conditions for community wealth building.” — Scott McIntyre
Secondary markets can help small investors diversify, recycle capital, and support more local ventures. But Devin Thorpe raised a real risk: micro-issuers (e.g., $50k–$200k raises) might face valuation volatility and “stock-price management” pressure.
McIntyre acknowledged we need evidence from real market microstructures to judge effects—especially for very small companies where investor sentiment can move prices more than fundamentals.
The Crypto Conditioning Effect: How Digital Assets Shape Liquidity Expectations
“Why does everyone want to invest in crypto? There’s extreme liquidity—you could buy and sell at any moment.” — Chris Lustrino
Crypto’s 24/7 trading recalibrated retail expectations. Many investors “don’t realize the difference between startups and this,” Lustrino noted. Designing secondary markets means balancing liquidity access with startup realities, so features don’t induce inappropriate pressure or unrealistic return timing.
Cross-Border Settlement Efficiency: The Correspondent-Banking Problem
Neera Patel underscored how multi-hop correspondent banking can turn small cross-border trades into slow, uneconomic transactions. Blockchain rails could compress hops and enable near-real-time settlement – if regulators and banks provide clear on/off-ramps.
Education as Infrastructure: Beyond Investor Awareness
“Education comes first… most investors should be aware that startups are long-term investments.” — Nora Szeles
Four audiences need tailored education:
- Investors: timelines, risk, portfolio construction, and secondary mechanics.
- Issuers: IR discipline, disclosure cadence, and how secondary activity affects operations and valuation.
- Regulators: how transparency/standardization in secondaries can enhance investor protection.
- Advisors/Intermediaries: portfolio fit and product governance for retail.
Key Areas Requiring Industry Attention
Market Velocity & Behavior: Balance investor liquidity needs with startup financing stability (e.g., partial liquidity windows, transparent pricing, realistic education).
Information Asymmetry: Move beyond minimal disclosure to standardized data, consistent valuation rubrics, third-party verification, and investor-usable research.
Cross-Border Coordination: Explore mutual recognition and principle-based supervision; test automated compliance where regulators permit.
Technology & Distribution: Build for explainability and partner with mainstream brokerage/advisory channels; adopt blockchain where it confers clear operational gains without adding UX friction.
Trust Infrastructure: Implement ratings, verification, auditable processes, and clear dispute resolution – trust is the market’s base currency.
Economic Impact: Quantifying the Trillion-Dollar Opportunity
(Scenario inputs for discussion; require validation and further research.)
- Liquidity Premium: Companies with credible secondary access may command ~20–40% valuation uplifts vs. illiquid peers.
- Participation Expansion: Liquidity confidence could increase investor deployment 3–5×, lifting total capital by 200–400% among current participants.
- Market Entry Acceleration: Reduced illiquidity barriers could expand the investor base 5–10×.
- Cross-Border Flows: EU–US alone could unlock $50B+ of currently constrained cross-border participation.
- Institutional On-Ramps: Secondary infrastructure that meets institutional standards could invite pensions/endowments that are otherwise constrained by illiquidity.
Critical Risks & Mitigations
Small-Company Valuation Pressure
- Holding-period requirements before secondary eligibility
- Company-controlled windows vs. continuous trading (for micro-issuers)
- Minimum information standards to list
- Investor education (or suitability gates) for secondaries
Technology Complexity & Trust
- Prioritize explainability; retain human oversight
- Full audit trails and independent dispute resolution
- Independent ratings/verification to reduce “black box” dynamics
Regulatory Backlash
- Continuous regulator dialogue; guardrails exceeding minimum rules
- Phased pilots in sandboxes; strong investor education
- Collaborative industry standards via neutral bodies (e.g., GECA)
First-Mover Dynamics
- Platforms, jurisdictions, and tech providers that establish liquidity, compliance, and data moats may capture durable network effects.
Conclusion: Toward Trust-First Secondary Market Development
Mainstream adoption likely depends less on a single technology and more on trust, transparency, and distribution. As Lustrino noted, the tipping point arrives when secondary access and research are embedded in familiar brokerage experiences. McIntyre reminds us: without accountability and verifiable transparency, enthusiasm fades and velocity stalls.
Given the interdependencies – regulation, technology, market design, and education – progress will come from iterative pilots, not a single, predetermined framework. This discussion paper aims to inform GECA-led working groups as they evaluate focused experiments that serve investors, issuers, platforms, and regulators – and advance the democratization of capital globally.
Next Steps & Participation
GECA will convene working groups (Liquidity, Policy & Standards, Technology) to scope 2–3 near-term pilots (e.g., a valuation-transparency prototype; a microstructure/liquidity-window trial; a KYC reciprocity sandbox). Stakeholders interested in contributing can register interest at thegeca.org.
Ready to explore the full discussion? Watch the complete Architects of Change panel where industry leaders examine the future of global equity crowdfunding: Breaking Down Borders – Full Discussion
Join the movement for borderless investment. GECA brings together platforms, regulators, and industry stakeholders to advance global equity crowdfunding. Learn more about membership opportunities and help shape the industry’s future: thegeca.org/membership-app-form
